Discussing this in itself, is an 'un-holy' act already. No way you need to let this pass through. They are just stretching the human mind to fit global fascism.
Are the liberals rioting already? They should now more than ever. Or is rioting against obama 'forbidden' for real 'freedomfighters'? If they don't start protesting for this you can use this example for now and forever to proof they are communist instigators.
Have any of you noticed that the people in here who are on the political Right, have names that start with R (Robert, Ronald, Raymond), while the lone person on the political Left, has a name that starts with L (LaTroll)?
It is true that Lores' name starts with an L, but her last name, Rizkalla, starts with an R, so it must mean that she began as a Liberal (as did many of us), but ended up being on the political Right, just like Rudy, Romney, and Ronald Reagan.
I don't think people should be called either right or left, conservative or progressive or whatever. You need to be conservative where and when you need to be conservative and you need to be progressive when you need to be progressive. Progression in science would be nice; conservative in Christian morals and values in the west would be nice too. Being liberal would supposedly mean wanting to be free, yet the communists hijacked the term to promote communism. Islam is unrationally conservative and unliberal, yet the 'socialist' liberals embrace and protect it in an insane suicide. Amongst the people I want dead are muslim terrorists and communists mindrapers, but also people who harm animals and 'kapitalist' swines who destroy nature with their dumping of waste. There shouldn't be a choice between right or left, but between realistic and lunatic. Voting 'left' is voting for islam and communism. so no one in his right mind can vote 'left'.
I think the terms were made up in a conspiracy to divide, rule and conquer the dumb people and to mindrape the smarter people into forcing a choice between the two.
I am not sure if I agree or disagree with Robert on this one, but I can tell you where I stand on the issues he just talked about.
For one thing, I do not necessarily differentiate religion from politics. I think that the two are too closely intertwined, to be separated in any realistic way. Seen in that light, I think that islamofascism is the worst example of the religious Right; they are the inheritors not only of how the most loyal followers of Mohammed have always behaved, but how Christians also were, back in the days of the Crusades and Inquisitions.
As to how can it be that the America-hating socialists, who are way far on the political Left, seem to ally themselves with the islamofascists, all I can say is that politics makes strange bedfellows. Sometimes somebody can go so far to the Left that they end up on the extreme Right, and visa versa. I think Pat Buchanan is one example of this phenomena; he is so far to the Right, that he often finds himself allied with the political Left. I am certainly no fan of Pat Buchanan, nor of Ron Paul.
As for animal rights, this may shock some people in here, but I am actually for animal rights, to some extent. Of course I think groups like PETA are absolutely nuts, yet I also think that we have a moral duty to refrain from causing unnecessary pain to animals.
That is why I voted in favor of that proposition on the California ballot a few months ago, that requires companies dealing with animals, to allow them enough room to turn around, spread their wings, and so on.
As a corollary, I personally abhor hunting; it is beyond my understanding how anybody can get pleasure out of shooting animals who never did the person any harm. I am a conservative, but not a blue-blood, country club, Mrs Howell type of conservative. I regard myself as a compassionate conservative, a neo-con. For me, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain would each be great Presidents, as have been George Bush and of course Ronald Reagan.
Lores Rizkalla
6 Comments
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend
Reader Comments (6)
No way you need to let this pass through. They are just stretching the human mind to fit global fascism.
They should now more than ever. Or is rioting against obama 'forbidden' for real 'freedomfighters'?
If they don't start protesting for this you can use this example for now and forever to proof they are communist instigators.
It is true that Lores' name starts with an L, but her last name, Rizkalla, starts with an R, so it must mean that she began as a Liberal (as did many of us), but ended up being on the political Right, just like Rudy, Romney, and Ronald Reagan.
Progression in science would be nice; conservative in Christian morals and values in the west would be nice too. Being liberal would supposedly mean wanting to be free, yet the communists hijacked the term to promote communism. Islam is unrationally conservative and unliberal, yet the 'socialist' liberals embrace and protect it in an insane suicide.
Amongst the people I want dead are muslim terrorists and communists mindrapers, but also people who harm animals and 'kapitalist' swines who destroy nature with their dumping of waste.
There shouldn't be a choice between right or left, but between realistic and lunatic.
Voting 'left' is voting for islam and communism. so no one in his right mind can vote 'left'.
I think the terms were made up in a conspiracy to divide, rule and conquer the dumb people and to mindrape the smarter people into forcing a choice between the two.
For one thing, I do not necessarily differentiate religion from politics. I think that the two are too closely intertwined, to be separated in any realistic way. Seen in that light, I think that islamofascism is the worst example of the religious Right; they are the inheritors not only of how the most loyal followers of Mohammed have always behaved, but how Christians also were, back in the days of the Crusades and Inquisitions.
As to how can it be that the America-hating socialists, who are way far on the political Left, seem to ally themselves with the islamofascists, all I can say is that politics makes strange bedfellows. Sometimes somebody can go so far to the Left that they end up on the extreme Right, and visa versa. I think Pat Buchanan is one example of this phenomena; he is so far to the Right, that he often finds himself allied with the political Left. I am certainly no fan of Pat Buchanan, nor of Ron Paul.
As for animal rights, this may shock some people in here, but I am actually for animal rights, to some extent. Of course I think groups like PETA are absolutely nuts, yet I also think that we have a moral duty to refrain from causing unnecessary pain to animals.
That is why I voted in favor of that proposition on the California ballot a few months ago, that requires companies dealing with animals, to allow them enough room to turn around, spread their wings, and so on.
As a corollary, I personally abhor hunting; it is beyond my understanding how anybody can get pleasure out of shooting animals who never did the person any harm. I am a conservative, but not a blue-blood, country club, Mrs Howell type of conservative. I regard myself as a compassionate conservative, a neo-con. For me, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain would each be great Presidents, as have been George Bush and of course Ronald Reagan.