More Ahmadinejad Poison
President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is spouting off again. This time, the bully is taunting President Bush in his final few months in office.
I'd like to hear about how both McCain and Obama propose to deal with this guy. I don't think I've heard any reasonable response that reflects the reality of the danger Iran presents. I don't want a trigger-happy President any more than I want one who is completely naive about the issue.
Reader Comments (4)
I am not searching for a trigger happy president; however, I do contend for a president with the ability to distinguish a real global threat. Iran's alliances (Syria and Venezuela namely) have both expressed their hatred for the US while Iran has made claims about wiping Israel off of the map.
How can this man be allowed to continue on? I believe that it would be less than rash to grant Iran the privilege of an ultimatium - epespecially since we now have the support of the European Union.
As for Iran, I go much further than merely bombing their nuclear facilities. It is a given that we need to do that; I do not understand what excuses there can be for the delay. I am hoping that President Bush will do what is necessary, sometime before his Presidency is over.
But I think we make a mistake by ascribing too much power to inanimate objects. Nuclear bombs do not kill people; people kill people. Put another way, nuclear bombs in the hands of England or Israel, does no harm; but box cutters in the hands of islamofascist terrorists, causes 3,000 innocent Americans to die on 9/11.
The point is, that even more important than destroying Iran's nuclear capability, is that we bring the Shah back to power over there. The radical islamofascist terrorists must not be allowed to continue ruling over Iran; its leadership must be replaced with a pro-Western, pro-America, pro-Israel Shah of Iran.