I read that I suddenly had "Secret Agent Man" in my head. I'm sorry, but dangerous only applies to our current administration. I'm in D.C. now and you should see the "dangerous aura" that floats over the White House.
President Bush is dangerous only to those who hate the freedom, liberty, and equality of opportunity that America offers. Some of us already recognize the greatness of that man. In decades to come, he will be considered the Republican answer to the late great Presidents Harry Truman and Teddy Roosevelt.
The only truly dangerous non-islamofascist in politics in the last several decades has been Dhimmi Carter. Aside from being an antisemite who hates America, he is simply an evil man, satan's helper.
As for Barack Hussein Osama Obama, I would put him somewhere between Dhimmi Carter and Bill Clinton. Dhimmi Carter does evil and means to do evil, because he is an evil man. Bill Clinton did major harm while he was President as well, particularly in his foreign policy, but I do not think his intentions were ever bad.
Obama, I think, means well, but surrounds himself with truly bad people and organizations. But unlike Carter, I do not think he is an inherently evil man. Nevertheless, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and it would be a disaster if, G-d forbid, Obama became President.
Why anybody with a working brain and intact moral values would vote for anybody other than John McCain this coming November, is beyond my understanding.
Lores Rizkalla
2 Comments
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend
Reader Comments (2)
I read that I suddenly had "Secret Agent Man" in my head. I'm sorry, but dangerous only applies to our current administration. I'm in D.C. now and you should see the "dangerous aura" that floats over the White House.
The only truly dangerous non-islamofascist in politics in the last several decades has been Dhimmi Carter. Aside from being an antisemite who hates America, he is simply an evil man, satan's helper.
As for Barack Hussein Osama Obama, I would put him somewhere between Dhimmi Carter and Bill Clinton. Dhimmi Carter does evil and means to do evil, because he is an evil man. Bill Clinton did major harm while he was President as well, particularly in his foreign policy, but I do not think his intentions were ever bad.
Obama, I think, means well, but surrounds himself with truly bad people and organizations. But unlike Carter, I do not think he is an inherently evil man. Nevertheless, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and it would be a disaster if, G-d forbid, Obama became President.
Why anybody with a working brain and intact moral values would vote for anybody other than John McCain this coming November, is beyond my understanding.