« It's Not Looking Good | Main | Who Won? »

The Power of Palin

Janice Turner of the Times Online clearly has no affinity for Sarah Palin. In her latest piece, "Why I Love This Candy-Covered Ball of Granite," she admits to what I agree is one of Palin's greatests strengths: authenticity.

But the power of Palin - what I enjoy about her, despite myself - is that she celebrates mothers as tough and capable, resourceful and stoic: moms as the political front line!

She goes on to talk about the power of the Palin family:

After that debate, those who loathe Mrs Palin will still loathe her; those who cleave to her will find no new reason to be repelled. It is just shtick, she's sticking to the rigid train tracks of her notes, you tell yourself when she says how Saturday soccer parents fret at the touchline over their investments. But then the debate ends, her great messy family spreads out on stage, and Mrs Palin tenderly passes her always-placid Down's baby to her little girl. The sound is off, the scripted babble is over. It is a silent gesture, something compellingly real in a cooked-up world.

While I don't agree with Turner on most of her assertions, this "power" is undeniable. Regardless of what happens on November 4, Sarah Palin is here to stay.

Posted on Saturday, October 4, 2008 at 07:56AM by Registered CommenterLores Rizkalla | Comments3 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

As much as I am totally enamored with the beautiful Sarah Palin (as are, I suspect, most normal American men), I have come to the conclusion that she was the wrong Vice Presidential running mate for John McCain to choose. She is too pure and innocent to deal with all these cruel, seasoned politicians.

I have been bashing Mitt Romney supporters all of these months, but I now realize that he should have been the Vice Presidential choice, and perhaps should have even been the Republican nominee for President. He is far more articulate, forceful, and simply alive than is John McCain. Romney's ties to both Michigan and Massachusettes could have helped break the liberal stanglehold that exists in those key areas of the country. And while Romney has a reputation for being a flip flopper, at least he has become increasingly conservative over the years, while McCain is just too moderate to be considered a true conservative.

Whatever. It makes no difference now. barack hussein osama obama is going to win, and there is nothing any of us can do about it. In fact, I am strongly considering not voting at all for the first time since I have been old enough to vote. I figure, why bother? G-d Himself would have lost these elections, had He run against Obama. That is how brainwashed tens of millions of Americans have become. They are completely under the spell of that islamofascist-raised con artist, barack hussein osama obama.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008 at 09:56PM | Unregistered CommenterRaymond
There were several issues that would have made Mitt a big problem. 1. Bragging about gun control he pushed in his state. No Republican has won without the Second Amendment voters. 2. His faith. I know a few people that wouldn't vote for a Mormon. 3. His floating abortion beliefs.

He would have been to radioactive
Wednesday, October 8, 2008 at 09:44PM | Unregistered CommenterDakotaranger
You make excellent points. I also had a big problem with Mitt Romney's vascillating position on abortion. As for his being a mormon, I actually like that about him, since I know that the mormons are particularly pro-Israel. In any case, I am glad that John McCain chose Sarah Palin. She is so beautiful and adorable that just looking at her and listening to her sweet voice, melts my heart.
Thursday, October 16, 2008 at 09:04PM | Unregistered CommenterRaymond

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.